Skip to main content
· 2/18/1998

Anthony C. MATHIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JOHN MORDEN BUICK, INC., Defendant-Appellee

Citations

  • 136 F.3d 1153
  • 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 2411
  • 72 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,230
  • 76 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 352
  • 1998 WL 63843

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “That the documents were destroyed intentionally no one can doubt, but ‘bad faith’ means destruction for the purpose of hiding adverse information.”
  • “That the documents were destroyed intentionally no one can doubt, but ‘bad faith’ means destruction for the purpose of hiding adverse information.”
  • “That the documents were destroyed intentionally no one can doubt, but ‘bad faith’ means destruction for the purpose of hiding adverse information.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eschbach, Coffey, Easterbrook

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.