Anthony Armienti v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding for a hearing where appellant alleged several specified instances of attorney’s deficiencies that were product of specific conflict of interest
• requiring the court to “inquir[e]” into possible conflicts of interest, and relieve counsel, or obtain a waiver, only where that inquiry reveals an actual conflict
• ordering an evidentiary hearing on a potential conflict of interest because defense counsel was under investigation by the same United States Attorney’s Office prosecuting the defendant
• remanding for a hearing where 21 appellant alleged several specified instances of attorney’s 22 deficiencies that were product of specific conflict of interest
• requiring the court to “inquir[e]” into possible conflicts of interest, and relieve counsel, or obtain a waiver, only where that inquiry reveals an actual conflict
• finding an ineffective-assistance claim “plausible” when defense lawyer was being criminally investigated by same prosecutors office as had charged defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).