ANTHONIA OGBANUFE v. CHARLES BLOOM and WENDY BLOOM

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “determinations regarding children whose best interests are at risk . . . require expedient consideration”
• explaining that in considering a motion to continue, the court recognizes that the child’s “best interests are at risk” and “require expedient consideration”
• explaining the “child[ren’s] best interests are at risk and require expedient consideration”
• “It is inconceivable that the legislature intended that a plan for adoption be a prerequisite to severance . . . .”
• delays in permanency for a child may be relevant in assessing a continuance request

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).