Skip to main content
· 4/30/2008

Antelope Valley Press v. Poizner

Citations

  • 75 Cal. Rptr. 3d 887
  • 162 Cal. App. 4th 839
  • 2008 Cal. App. LEXIS 657
  • 2 Cal. WCC 415

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that carriers are employees, notwithstanding contract stating that they are independent contractors
  • noting lack of evidence that carriers “hold themselves out as being an independent delivery service that happens to have AVP as one of its customers”
  • using manners and means approach to evaluate the right to control
  • describing the traditional “notion [of] an independent contractor [as] someone hired to achieve a specific result that is attainable within a finite period of time, such as plumbing work, tax service, or the creation of a work of art for a building’s lobby”
  • termination with thirty-day notice requirement “clearly” gives employer the right to discharge at-will without cause
  • termination with thirty-day notice requirement \clearly\ gives employer the right to discharge at-will without cause

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Croskey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.