Antelope Co. v. Mobil Rocky Mountain, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he factual determination of the privity issue should be made by the court, not by the jury.” (citing Lowell Staats Mining Co. v. Phila. Elec. Co., 878 F.2d 1271, 1275-76 (10th Cir. 1989), and People v. Tynan, 701 P.2d 80, 83-84 (Colo. App. 1984))
• “[T]he factual determination of the privity issue should be made by the court, not by the jury.” (citing Lowell Staats Mining Co. v. Phila. Elec. Co. , 878 F.2d 1271, 1275-76 (10th Cir. 1989), and People v. Tynan , 701 P.2d 80, 83-84 (Colo. App. 1984))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).