Antekeier v. Lab. Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding private land owners cannot claim full expectation of privacy in lands subject to recorded deed restrictions
• stating that administrative agencies may address constitutional issues that are relevant and necessary to resolving questions within its jurisdiction
• explaining that “we must examine th[e statute’s plain] language sensibly, in the context of the overall scheme in which the Legislature intended the provision to operate” (citation omitted)
• explaining that “we must examine th[e statute’s plain] language sensibly, in the context of the overall scheme in which the Legislature intended the provision 50 to operate” (citation omitted)
• stating that “we must examine ... statutory language sensibly, in the context of the overall scheme in which the Legislature intended the provision to operate” (citing Merin v. Maglaki 126 N.J. 430, 436, 599 A.2d 1256 (1992))
• stating that “we must examine . . . statutory language sensibly, in the context of the overall scheme in which the Legislature intended the provision to operate” (citing Merin v. Maglaki, 126 N.J. 430, 436 (1992)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).