Antar v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the presumption of public access can be rebutted \if there are compelling reasons of personal privacy\
• finding that the presumption of public access can be rebutted \if there are compelling reasons of personal privacy\
• finding that the presumption of public access can be rebutted \if there are compelling reasons of personal privacy\
• noting that “most settlement agreements never show up in a judicial record and so are not subject to the right of public access,” because “[e]ither the agreement is made before a suit is filed (and so the suit is never filed
• denying motion to seal while recognizing that making settlement public may invite more suits against a defendant
• “Documents that affect the disposition of federal litigation are presumptively open to public view.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).