Anstine v. Centex Home Equity Co. (In Re Pepper)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• af-firming bankruptcy court’s finding that perfecting after seven months and 18 days was not substantially contemporaneous
• concluding failure to include transcript and exhibits required summary affirmance
• affirming bankruptcy court’s holding that exchange was not substantially contemporaneous due to delay of seven months between disbursement of loan proceeds/execution of the deed and the recording of the deed
• affirming bankruptcy court’s holding that exchange was not substantially contemporaneous due to delayed seven months between disbursement of loan proceeds/execution of the deed and recording of the deed
• “Without a transcript and exhibits from the trial, •this court cannot review the bankruptcy court’s factual findings and will summarily affirm this decision of the bankruptcy court.”
• “Whether a transaction was contemporaneous within the meaning of the exception to the preferential transfer statute is a question of fact that is reviewed for clear error.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).