Anson v. Anson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Simply because a shareholder-spouse devotes work efforts to a corporation during marriage should not transform the entire appreciation of the stock into a marital asset”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Zold v. Zold
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2005-09-15· cited 39×
• Simmons v. Simmons
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-03-31· cited 27×
• Abdnour v. Abdnour
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-05-08· cited 9×
• Batson v. Batson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-06-28· cited 9×
• Zold v. Zold
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-06-25· cited 6×
• Carole Ann Berg v. Roy Timothy Young
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-09-02· cited 6×
• Bair v. Bair
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-03-22· cited 6×
• Doctor Rooter Supply & Service v. McVay
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-09-07· cited 6×
• Cattaneo v. Cattaneo
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-01-04· cited 5×
• Pereboom v. Pereboom
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-06-06· cited 5×
• Stough v. Stough
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-06-27· cited 4×
• GILBERT RAMOS v. PAULA RAMOS
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-11-29· cited 2×
• Reed v. Honoshofsky
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-09-28· cited 2×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Speer v. Quinlan
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1974-07-26· cited 65×
• Pannell v. Pannell
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1998-12-16· cited 9×
• Rutland v. Rutland
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-02-17· cited 7×
• Martinez v. Martinez
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-05-31· cited 6×