Anselma Crossing, L.P. v. United States Postal Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “the policy goals of the CDA [are] to collect contract disputes against the government in a forum ... with both the requisite expertise and the ability to provide consistency in applying the laws related to government contracts”
• joining the clear majority of appeals courts in concluding the Contract Disputes Act of 1978, 41 U.S.C. §§ 7101-7109, “bars breach of contract and ‘essentially contractual’ claims against the [USPS] in the district courts of the United States”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).