Ansell Healthcare, Inc. v. Maersk Line

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that plaintiff failed to effect mail service in Thailand under Rule 4(f)(2)(A) because it did not obtain a prior court order for mail service as required under Thai law
• relying on legal opinion from Thai attorney to conclude that service did not comport with Thai law and was therefore improper under Rule 4(f)(2)(A)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).