Skip to main content
· 3/3/2009

Anschutz Entertainment Group, Inc. v. Snepp

Citations

  • 171 Cal. App. 4th 598

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding order striking defamation per se claim pleading only general damages in connection with television broadcast where retraction was not demanded in compliance with statute; stating that “the purpose of Civil Code section 48a, subdivision (1
  • dismissing defamation claims under anti-SLAPP where 12 no legally enforceable correction demand was served by the plaintiff and where special damages 13 were pled only through generalized allegations of indeterminate damages and plaintiff “presented 14 no proof of special damages”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Turner, Armstrong, Kriegler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.