Skip to main content

Anostario v. Vicinanzo

Citations

  • 59 N.Y.2d 662
  • 450 N.E.2d 215
  • 463 N.Y.S.2d 409
  • 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3052

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • for conduct to be “unequivocally referable,” it must be “explainable only with reference to the oral agreement”
  • “While the agreement alleged provides a possible motivation for plaintiff’s actions, the performance is equivocal, for it is as reasonably explained by the possibility of other expectations”
  • in Statute of Frauds context, “[t]he doctrine of part performance may be invoked only if plaintiffs actions can be characterized as unequivocally referable to the agreement alleged.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

132 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Anostario v. Vicinanzo

5 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.