Anonymous Taxpayer v. South Carolina Department of Revenue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that, under the facts presented, the particular claim alleged by plaintiff constituted only one cause of action, and therefore, there was no continuing injury that would trigger a new limitations period
• finding that, under the facts presented, the particular claim alleged by plaintiff constituted only one cause of action, and therefore, there was no continuing injury that would trigger a new limitations period
• finding that, under the facts presented, the particular claim alleged by plaintiff constituted only one cause of action, and therefore, there was no continuing injury that would trigger a new limitations period
• “The limitations period begins to run when a party knows or should know, through the exercise of due diligence, that a cause of action might exist.”
• “The statute of limitations for actions pursuant to [a] contract ... is three years.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).