Skip to main content
· 9/23/2002

Annie Godoski v. United States

Citations

  • 304 F.3d 761
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 19794
  • 2002 WL 31103020

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • characterizing a coram nobis petition attacking the petitioner’s conviction on constitu- tional grounds as a mislabeled § 2255 motion
  • “A person whose incarceration lies in the future is in custody and has full access to § 2255.”
  • court must evaluate independently the substance of the claim being brought, to see if correct statute is being invoked

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Easterbrook, Kanne, Evans

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.