Skip to main content
· 1/20/1988

Anne M. LOGUE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. INTERNATIONAL REHABILITATION ASSOCIATES, INC., Et Al., Defendants-Appellants

Citations

  • 837 F.2d 150
  • 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 561
  • 45 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 37,711
  • 45 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1382
  • 1988 WL 2481

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “the district court erred in failing to consider all of [the employer’s] proffered evidence of legitimate business reasons for [the plaintiff’s] termination”
  • holding that \the district court erred in failing to consider all of [the employer's] proffered evidence of legitimate business reasons for [the plaintiff's] termination\ (emphasis supplied)
  • finding that “if an employer articulates several alternative and independent legitimate, nondiscriminatory reasons, the falsity of one does not necessarily justify finding the remaining articulated reasons pretextual.”
  • district court must consider all relevant evidence in order to make its findings of fact and conclusions of law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Becker, Scirica, Rosenn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.