· 7/12/1999
Anna Harris v. Edna Itzhaki Rafael Itzhaki
Citations
- 183 F.3d 1043
- 99 Daily Journal DAR 7009
- 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5513
- 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 15219
- 1999 WL 476860
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that claims for prospective relief had become moot, but that damage claim included in plaintiff's initial prayer for relief was unaffected by Arizonans
- holding jury could reasonably find principal-agent relationship under FHA even though defendants did not compensate or offer rental discount to purported agent.
- holding requests for declaratory and prospective injunctive relief for FHA discrimination claim were rendered moot when the plaintiff voluntarily vacated the property at issue
- setting forth elements of a disparate treatment claim under the FHA
- plaintiffs request for declaratory and injunctive relief against building owner were rendered moot by her departure from the apartment
- “isolated discriminatory remark ... not considered indicative of [ ] discrimination” in Title VII context
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hug, Browning, Zilly
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.