Skip to main content
· 7/12/1999

Anna Harris v. Edna Itzhaki Rafael Itzhaki

Citations

  • 183 F.3d 1043
  • 99 Daily Journal DAR 7009
  • 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5513
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 15219
  • 1999 WL 476860

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that claims for prospective relief had become moot, but that damage claim included in plaintiff's initial prayer for relief was unaffected by Arizonans
  • holding jury could reasonably find principal-agent relationship under FHA even though defendants did not compensate or offer rental discount to purported agent.
  • holding requests for declaratory and prospective injunctive relief for FHA discrimination claim were rendered moot when the plaintiff voluntarily vacated the property at issue
  • setting forth elements of a disparate treatment claim under the FHA
  • plaintiffs request for declaratory and injunctive relief against building owner were rendered moot by her departure from the apartment
  • “isolated discriminatory remark ... not considered indicative of [ ] discrimination” in Title VII context

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hug, Browning, Zilly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.