· 5/10/2002
Anna D. Wells v. Unisource Worldwide, Inc.
Citations
- 289 F.3d 1001
- 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 9031
- 82 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,101
- 88 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1232
- 2002 WL 959511
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting the former employee’s elaborate conspiracy theory regarding the transfer of jobs from Illinois to Wisconsin, which caused her to lose hers, because the record lacked a scintilla of evidence to support it
- rejecting the former employee’s elaborate conspiracy theory regarding the transfer of jobs from Illinois to Wisconsin, which caused her to lose hers, because the record lacked a scintilla of evidence to support it
- “We have typically been wary of allegations based on nothing but an attempt to come up with a conspiracy theory.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bauer, Coffey, Evans
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.