Ann S. Mullin v. Edmond Gettinger, Burton Witthuhn, and Eric Stiffler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a one-year gap was too attenuated to provide evidence that an employee’s speech was a motivating factor
• holding that a one-year gap was too attenuated to provide evidence that an employee’s speech was a motivating factor
• “[T]he fact that a plaintiffs protected speech may precede an adverse employment decision alone does not establish causation.”
• the nearly two-year time gap between a letter and an adverse action is too attenuated to provide evidence that the letter motivated the adverse action
• \[T]he fact that a plaintiff's protected speech may precede an adverse employment decision alone does not establish causation\
• “[T]he fact that a plaintiff's protected speech may precede an adverse employment decision alone does not establish causation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).