· 6/28/1988
Ann McLaughlin Secretary of Labor v. Ho Fat Seto, Dba: Ho Fat of California
Citations
- 850 F.2d 586
- 1988 WL 65051
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that, based on representative testimony, “[t]he twenty-three non-testifying employees established a prima facie case that they had worked unreported hours”
- holding that, based on representative testimony, “[t]he twenty-three non-testifying employees established a prima facie case that they had worked unreported hours”
- holding that, based on representative testimony, “[t]he twenty-three non-testifying employees established a pri-ma facie case that they had worked unreported hours”
- holding that, based on representative testimony, “[t]he twenty-three non-testifying employees established a prima facie case that they had worked unreported hours”
- affirming damages award where employees gave varied testimony on the means employer used to underpay overtime
- affirming damages award where employees gave varied testimony on the means employer used to underpay overtime
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tang, Fletcher, Pregerson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.