Skip to main content
· 6/28/1988

Ann McLaughlin Secretary of Labor v. Ho Fat Seto, Dba: Ho Fat of California

Citations

  • 850 F.2d 586
  • 1988 WL 65051

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, based on representative testimony, “[t]he twenty-three non-testifying employees established a prima facie case that they had worked unreported hours”
  • holding that, based on representative testimony, “[t]he twenty-three non-testifying employees established a prima facie case that they had worked unreported hours”
  • holding that, based on representative testimony, “[t]he twenty-three non-testifying employees established a pri-ma facie case that they had worked unreported hours”
  • holding that, based on representative testimony, “[t]he twenty-three non-testifying employees established a prima facie case that they had worked unreported hours”
  • affirming damages award where employees gave varied testimony on the means employer used to underpay overtime
  • affirming damages award where employees gave varied testimony on the means employer used to underpay overtime

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tang, Fletcher, Pregerson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.