Ankele v. Hambrick

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating the fact that the plaintiff “was free to travel without geographic limitation is particularly significant” and finding no seizure
• granting a motion for summary judgment on two counts where the nonmovant failed to respond to the movant’s arguments
• finding summary judgment appropriate on Fourteenth Amendment malicious prosecution claim because plaintiff made no response to defendant’s argument, and thus waived his opportunity to contest that claim
• granting summary judgment on the premise that a plaintiff’s failure to respond to one of the arguments in the defendant’s motion results in his waiver of the opportunity to contest summary judgment on that ground
• “Plaintiff makes no response to this argument, and thus has waived his opportunity to contest it. Therefore, summary judgment is appropriate.”
• “Plaintiff makes no response to this argument, and thus has waived his opportunity to contest it. Therefore, summary judgment is appropriate.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).