Anjulo-Lopez v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• considering whether prisoner could have learned needed information through a public record in assessing “due diligence” under' section’2255(f)(4)
• affirming the district court’s denial of the § 2255 motion as untimely, despite petitioner’s claim of extended § 2255(f)(4
• finding petitioner lacked due diligence in pursuing an appeal where he waited an entire year to contact his attorney regarding appeal
• finding a duly diligent person in movant’s circumstances would have discovered counsel’s failure to file a notice of appeal well over a year before he filed his motion
• finding a duly diligent person in movant’s circumstances would have discovered counsel’s failure to file a notice of appeal well over a year before he filed his motion
• calculating finality based on expiration of deadline to file a notice of appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).