Anitra D. Davis v. U.S. Bancorp, Doing Business as U.S. Bank National Association John Doe Mary Roe Persons Unknown

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding uncontradicted employee affidavit describing company procedures and sending of notice was “sufficient to establish that the notice was sent”
• setting apart ECOA's procedural requirements for extending credit and communicating with applicants from “generalized prohibition of discrimination”
• affirming the denial of sanctions when the movant “failed to explain how an earlier disclosure of [the] testimony would have enabled her to avoid summary judgment” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• no abuse of discretion to allow testimony when \district court reasonably found that there was no unfair surprise\ about the topic of testimony
• no abuse of discretion to allow testimony when “district court reasonably found that there was no unfair surprise” about the topic of testimony
• citations 17 Case 4:18-cv-00342-KGB Document 237 Filed 09/30/22 Page 18 of 56 omitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).