Anita Patt, M.D. v. Family Health Systems, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “an employer's deliberate de- nial of career opportunities could constitute an adverse em- ployment action”
• holding that eight gender-based comments over several years, several of which were hearsay, were not sufficiently pervasive to support a hostile environment claim
• holding that eight gender-based comments over the term of the plaintiff’s employment was not pervasive
• reasoning that plaintiff may not rely on previously rejected discrimination claim as basis for adverse employment action in retaliation charge
• holding that plaintiff’s complaints of eight gender-related comments during course No. 03-2738 11 of her employment, including that “the only valuable thing to a woman is that she has breasts and a vagina,” insuffi- cient to demonstrate hostile work environment
• reasoning that plaintiff may not rely on previously rejected discrimina- tion claim as basis for adverse employment action in retal- iation charge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).