Animal Welfare Institute v. Martin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that affidavits from its members who visited wildlife refuges and parks to observe wildlife adequately alleged that the organization suffered injury
• collecting cases for the proposition that “[t]his circuit has consistently applied the traditional tests for preliminary injunctions in ESA cases.”
• likelihood that State of Maine regulations increased risk of “takes” of threatened Canada Lynx constituted an injury in fact to environmentalist plaintiffs
• “[E]xhaustion might also be excused where repeated 20 rejections of an inmate's grievances at the screening stage give rise to a reasonable good 21 faith belief that administrative remedies are effectively unavailable.”
• “arguments raised for the first time in a reply brief are waived”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).