· 2/15/2008
Animal Legal Defense Fund v. Mendes
Citations
- 72 Cal. Rptr. 3d 553
- 160 Cal. App. 4th 136
- 2008 Cal. App. LEXIS 229
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting plaintiffs’ benefit of the bargain theory because the plaintiffs “d[id] not allege any false or misleading representations that could be said to have become part of the purchase and sale agreement”
- rejecting plaintiffs’ benefit of the bargain theory because the plaintiffs “d[id] not allege any false or misleading representations that could be said to have become part of the purchase and sale agreement”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Vartabedian
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.