Skip to main content
· 2/15/2008

Animal Legal Defense Fund v. Mendes

Citations

  • 72 Cal. Rptr. 3d 553
  • 160 Cal. App. 4th 136
  • 2008 Cal. App. LEXIS 229

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting plaintiffs’ benefit of the bargain theory because the plaintiffs “d[id] not allege any false or misleading representations that could be said to have become part of the purchase and sale agreement”
  • rejecting plaintiffs’ benefit of the bargain theory because the plaintiffs “d[id] not allege any false or misleading representations that could be said to have become part of the purchase and sale agreement”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Vartabedian

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.