Anibal Moses Cardona-Barrrios D/B/A Cardona Steel Erectors v. Abel Godoy Ramos

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that Abdur’Rahman filed a Rule 60(b) motion relying upon Rule 39 on November 1, 2001, challenging the district court’s refusal to consider his prosecutorial misconduct claims as procedurally defaulted
• noting that Abdur'Rahman filed a Rule 60(b) motion relying upon Rule 39 on November 1, 2001, challenging the district court's refusal to consider his prosecutorial misconduct claims as procedurally defaulted
• noting that Abdur’Rahman filed a Rule 60(b) motion relying upon Rule 39 on November 1, 2001, challenging the district court’s refusal to consider his prosecutorial misconduct claims as procedurally defaulted
• “There is no constitutional prohibition against jurors simply knowing the parties involved or having knowledge of the case.”
• \Abdur'Rahman's motion is properly characterized as a Rule 60(b)(6) motion.\
• “Abdur’Rahman has satisfied the reasonable time requirement” of Rule 60(b)(6)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).