Anibal L. Taboas v. Bernard J. Mlynczak

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A denial of the United States’ motion for substitution under the Westfall Act is immediately appealable under the collateral order doctrine.”
• \A denial of the United States' motion for substitution under the Westfall Act is immediately appealable under the collateral order doctrine.\
• “[T]he plaintiff bears the burden of demonstrating that the Attorney General’s scope certification was erroneous.”
• “[T]he plaintiff bears the burden of demonstrating that the Attorney General’s scope certification was erroneous.”
• “[T]he district court may hold an evidentiary hearing to resolve material factual disputes related to the scope of employment.”
• Under Illinois law, an act by an employee falls within his scope of employment if “(a) it is of the kind he is employed to perform; (b) it occurs substantially within the authorized time and space limits; and (c

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).