Anhoco Corp. v. Dade County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that evidence of a defendant shooting an “unsuspecting, unarmed” victim clearly indicated specific intent to kill and malice
• holding challenge to jury instruction waived when defendant “cited no legal authorities nor developed any meaningful analysis”
• concluding the defendant “surely intended the shooting to have fatal results as he fired three shots at the victim’s head, a vital part of the body[]”
• concluding the defendant “surely intended the shooting to have fatal results as he fired three shots at the victim’s head, a vital part of the body[]”
• concluding the victim’s head to be a “vital part of the body”
• finding the appellant acted with malice and the specific intent to kill where he fired three shots at the back of the victim’s head, a vital part of the body

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).