Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. G.T. Britts Distributing, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing the distributor’s counterclaim under Section 3 of the Clayton Act because “[t]he Complaint does not allege that [the manufacturer’s] competitors are precluded from reaching retailers because of the [manufacturer’s handling of its distributor arrangements]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).