Skip to main content
· 10/12/1984

Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. Florists Ass'n of Greater Cleveland, Inc.

Citations

  • 603 F. Supp. 35
  • 224 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 493
  • 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22812

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • allowing defendant florist’s use of slogan “This Bud’s for you” because it had no “strength with respect to fresh-cut flowers”
  • allowing a defendant florist to use the slogan “This Bud’s For You” because it had no “strength with respect to fresh-cut flowers”
  • allowing defendant florist's use of slogan \This Bud's for you\ because it had no \strength with respect to fresh-cut flowers\
  • brewer denied an injunction against florist’s promotional campaign under Ohio Deceptive Trade Practices Act
  • brewer denied an injunction against florist’s promotional campaign under Ohio Deceptive Trade Practices Act
  • concerning slogan “This Bud’s For You” and deception of origin

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ann Aldrich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.