· 10/12/1984
Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. Florists Ass'n of Greater Cleveland, Inc.
Citations
- 603 F. Supp. 35
- 224 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 493
- 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22812
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- allowing defendant florist’s use of slogan “This Bud’s for you” because it had no “strength with respect to fresh-cut flowers”
- allowing a defendant florist to use the slogan “This Bud’s For You” because it had no “strength with respect to fresh-cut flowers”
- allowing defendant florist's use of slogan \This Bud's for you\ because it had no \strength with respect to fresh-cut flowers\
- brewer denied an injunction against florist’s promotional campaign under Ohio Deceptive Trade Practices Act
- brewer denied an injunction against florist’s promotional campaign under Ohio Deceptive Trade Practices Act
- concerning slogan “This Bud’s For You” and deception of origin
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ann Aldrich
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.