Anhalt v. Anhalt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the coordinate jurisdiction rule was violated because a party’s motion in limine and motion for summary judgment raised the same issue, and cited on the same evidence, and there was no indication that the successor judge relied on additional facts
• holding coordinate jurisdiction rule violated where court granted motion in limine predicated on same facts and arguments previously rejected by same court in denying motion for summary judgment five months earlier

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).