Angotti v. Kenyon & Kenyon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the failure to include a particular claim within an EEOC complaint was not a jurisdictional bar to bringing that claim in federal court, and that failure to do so should be excused in the case at bar
• noting that even if equitable tolling were applicable, “it is unclear what plaintiff would have this court ‘toll’ [if] he has not taken the first step in the process” by filing an administrative charge
• denying motion to dismiss with regard to equitable tolling because there was evidence that the pro se plaintiff, although an experienced attorney, was affirmatively misled by the EEOC interviewer
• baseless assertion that claim would be rejected if plaintiff checked the “retaliation” box on the EEOC charge form

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).