Skip to main content
· 8/2/1989

Angio-Medical Corp. v. Eli Lilly & Co.

Citations

  • 720 F. Supp. 269
  • 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9025
  • 1989 WL 86615

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • characterizing as defamatory claims that impute fraud, dishonesty, or unfitness to a company, and characterizing as injurious falsehood claims that would cause a listener to assume plaintiffs cosmetic skin and hair product did not meet safety and efficacy standards

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Conboy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.