· 8/2/1989
Angio-Medical Corp. v. Eli Lilly & Co.
Citations
- 720 F. Supp. 269
- 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9025
- 1989 WL 86615
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- characterizing as defamatory claims that impute fraud, dishonesty, or unfitness to a company, and characterizing as injurious falsehood claims that would cause a listener to assume plaintiffs cosmetic skin and hair product did not meet safety and efficacy standards
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Conboy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.