Anggelis v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a plaintiff could not plausibly allege that defendants “reached an understanding” to violate her rights “without [facts] showing contacts between [them]”
• holding that a plaintiff could not plausibly allege that defendants “reached an understanding” to violate her rights “without [facts] showing contacts between [them]”
• finding that “[o]nly in rare circumstances” will private individuals be converted into “state actors” for purposes of § 1983.
• holding the stringing together of steps in the commitment process without alleging contacts to prove an understanding was reached did not state a conspiracy claim
• finding that “[o]nly in rare circumstances” will private individuals be converted into “state actors” for purposes of § 1983.
• holding the stringing together of steps in the commitment process without alleging contacts to prove an understanding was reached did not state a conspiracy claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).