Angelo Riccitelli v. The Town of North Providence, by and through its Finance Director, Maria Vallee
Syllabus
The defendant, the Town of North Providence (the town), by and through its Interim Director of Finance, Maria Vallee, appealed from the Superior Court's entry of summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff, Angelo Riccitelli, a former firefighter employed by the town who retired after sustaining a work-related injury. Summary judgment turned on the meaning of the term \monthly net pay\ within a provision of the collective bargaining agreement between the town and Riccitelli's former union. <br><br>Before this Court, the town argued that the hearing justice erred in granting summary judgment because: (1) the hearing justice did not consider the town's proffered extrinsic evidence (2) Riccitelli's motion was improperly framed (3) Riccitelli failed to show the absence of any issue of material fact and (4) the provision of the collective bargaining agreement at issue was ambiguous. <br> <br>The Supreme Court concluded that, because Riccitelli never provided the full text of the collective bargaining agreement, which was necessary to any finding that the term \monthly net pay\ unambiguously supported his position, he failed to carry his initial burden of showing an absence of issues of material fact. His motion for summary judgment should have been denied on that basis. <br><br>Accordingly, the Supreme Court vacated the judgment of the Superior Court. <br>
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.