Skip to main content
· 1/7/2015

Angelia Ruffin v. MotorCity Casino

Citations

  • 775 F.3d 807
  • 2015 FED App. 0004P
  • 23 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1745
  • 2015 WL 72840
  • 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 236

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that compensation is not warranted when a job requirement does not preclude employees from using their breaks for other purposes
  • examining whether meal periods were compensable under the FLSA as \work\
  • examining whether meal periods were compensable under the FLSA as \work\
  • “It is the employee’s burden to prove that a meal period is compensable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cole, Griffin, Carr

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.