Skip to main content
· 4/29/2013

Angelia Lynette Maupin v. Paul Wayne Maupin

Citations

  • 420 S.W.3d 761
  • 2013 WL 1803602
  • 2013 Tenn. App. LEXIS 296

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “details of permanent parenting plans are typically left to the discretion of trial courts”
  • “The details of permanent parenting plans are typically left to the discretion of trial courts.”
  • “[T]he ultimate question as to who should be the primary residential parent on appeal is whether the trial court abused its discretion in its selection[.]”
  • “Our court has recognized that separating siblings is a drastic remedy. Siblings are to be separated only if extraordinary facts in the case require it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Susano, Swiney, Cantrell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.