Angeles Ramonita Garcia v. Kenneth R. Neagle, Warden, F. C. I. Alderson, and United States Parole Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that, “even where action is committed to absolute agency discretion by law [as with the Parole Commission], courts have assumed the power to review allegations that an agency. . . failed to follow its own regulations”
• applying this method of analysis in dispute over classification of \offense behavior\
• applying this method of analysis in dispute over classification of “offense behavior”
• observing in the context of reviewing a Parole Commission decision that \courts have assumed the power to review allegations that [the Commission] ... failed to follow its own regulations\
• indicating the limited standard of review of the District Court in reviewing agency action
• court may consider whether Guidelines “as promulgated and applied, violate the intent and directives of the Parole Act”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).