Skip to main content
· 8/4/1998

Angela Perez-Priego v. Alachua County Clerk of Court

Citations

  • 148 F.3d 1272
  • 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 17875
  • 1998 WL 438820

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a district court’s subsequent adoption of a recommendation cannot cure a premature appeal
  • holding that a magistrate judge’s R&R that has not been adopted by the district court is not final and appeala- ble
  • holding that a district court’s subsequent adoption of a recommendation cannot cure a premature appeal
  • holding that a magistrate judge’s recommendation that has not been adopted by the district court is not final and immediately appealable
  • holding that a magistrate judge’s recommendation that has not been adopted by the district court is not final and immediately appealable
  • holding that magistrate judge’s report and recommendation was not final and appealable where the district court had not adopted it before the notice of appeal was filed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Godbold, Hill, Fay

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.