Angela Dawn Perez- Dowling v. Legacy at Cypress

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that individuals “may not legitimately demand privacy for activities conducted out of doors in fields, except in the area immediately surrounding the home”
• holding that entry into private property to observe marijuana plants in violation of “No Trespassing” sign was not a search
• holding that \open fields\ — land \over a mile\ from defendant's home and beyond its curtilage — was not among \the places and things encompassed by [the Fourth Amendment's] protections\
• concluding that no single factor determines whether an individual legitimately may assert a claim under the Fourth Amendment that he should be free from governmental intrusion
• concluding that no single factor determines whether an individual legitimately may assert a claim under the Fourth Amendment that he should be free from governmental intrusion
• holding that narcotics agent searching for marijuana in the open fields of a farm was not a search even though it was a trespass

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).