Skip to main content
· 6/28/1994

Angela Berry v. William Deloney

Citations

  • 28 F.3d 604
  • 40 Fed. R. Serv. 1319
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 16241
  • 1994 WL 283342

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • district court’s unchallenged limiting instruction cured any potential prejudice from admission of evidence which was only admissible for limited purpose
  • evidence concerning victim’s prior and subsequent abortions not barred by Rape Shield Statute since jury could find it diminished amount of plaintiff’s claimed damages for pain, suffering and emotional injuries allegedly caused by victim’s sexual relationship with her school truant officer
  • evidence of past sexual activity is often “relevant because [a defendant is] not responsible for any emotional or physical injuries (damages) caused by…sexual activity with other men.” Berry v. Deloney, 28 F.3d 604, 608 (7th Cir. 1994

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Coffey, Ripple

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.