Angela Bernhardt v. County of Los Angeles Lloyd W. Pellman, Individually Lloyd W. Pellman, in His Official Capacity

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[t]he district court had both the power and the duty to raise the adequacy of [plaintiff]’s standing sua sponte”
• holding that a plaintiff’s claim for damages was not moot although the plaintiff's claim for prospective relief was
• holding that courts have “both the power and the duty” to raise standing sua sponte
• explaining that federal courts are required to examine jurisdictional issues sua sponte
• raising sua sponte mootness and the 19 capable of repetition yet evading review exception because it is a question of subject matter jurisdiction
• raising sua sponte mootness and the 18 capable of repetition yet evading review exception because it is a question of subject matter jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).