Angel v. Rand Express Lines, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing the fact-finder's prerogative to accept the opinions of certain testifying experts and to reject competing opinions of an opposing expert
• recognizing a trial court acting as fact-finder is free to accept or reject the testimony of any party's expert, in full or in part
• noting that a physician's experiential weakness may be exposed by showing he is a general practitioner rendering an opinion on a specialized area of medicine
• recognizing the fact-finder's prerogative to accept the opinions of certain testifying experts and to reject competing opinions of an opposing expert
• recognizing the fact-finder's prerogative to accept the opinions of certain testifying experts and to reject competing opinions of an opposing expert
• recognizing the trier of fact's ability to accept, in full or in part, the testimony of one expert over another

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).