Angel Tueros v. Charles Greiner, Sup't, Green Haven Correctional Facility

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that when “[l]eave to appeal the denial of the [petitioner’s] § 440 motion was denied” by the appellate division, the petitioner had “exhausted his state-court remedies”
• explaining that a 440 motion was properly exhausted after it was denied by the county court and \[l]eave to appeal the denial of the []440 motion was denied.\
• declining to address the ineffectiveness claim under the Strickland standard, after determining that Sullivan did not apply, where the petitioner had failed to present a Strickland argument
• determination of wheth- er a conflict of interest exists turns on analysis of “actual duties” rather than an at- torney’s subjective sense of conflict
• “[P]etitioner failed to present a Strickland argument to this Court in his brief, and expressly disclaimed the applicability of Strickland during oral argument, so we consider petitioner's Strickland argument to have been abandoned.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).