Angel Toucet v. Maritime Overseas Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that sufficient evidence was introduced to support the jury’s determination that a seaman’s employer was negligent in requiring him to continue working despite his claims of exhaustion and inadequate assistance, and that this negligence contributed to the seaman’s back injury
• \We are looking forward to stronger sales for the remainder of the year\ held actionable
• \misappropriation occurs if information from a customer database is used to solicit customers.\
• “Federal Rules of Evidence 703 and 705 place the full burden of exploration of the facts and assumptions underlying the testimony of an expert witness squarely on the shoulders of opposing counsel's cross- examination.”
• “In this circuit, a ‘party waives inconsistency if it fails to object after the verdict is read and before the jury is dismissed.’” (quoting Bonilla v. Yamaha Motors Corp., 955 F.2d 150, 155-56 (1st Cir. 1992))
• “In this circuit, a ‘party waives inconsistency if it fails to object after the verdict is read and before the jury is dismissed.’ ” (quoting Bonilla v. Yamaha Motors Corp., 955 F.2d 150, 155-56 (1st Cir. 1992))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).