Angel Medina v. The State of Florida

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the government’s conduct in a criminal investigation was entitled to the presumption of regularity in the absence of “clear evidence to the contrary”
• affirming a sentence based upon intended loss pursuant to a precursor to 5 § 2B1.1
• \[I]ntended loss under applica- tion note [8] to Guidelines section 2F1.1 is not limited to an amount that was possible or likely.\
• \It is the defendant's duty to elicit the reasons for refusing to grant a downward departure . . . .\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).