Anesh Gupta v. Richard T. McGahey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the plaintiff’s “claims that [an ICE agent] illegally procured an arrest warrant, that the agents illegally arrested him, and that the agents illegally detained him” are “exactly the claims that § 1252(g) bars”
• finding that the appellant’s claims under the Fourth and Fifth Amendments alleging “wrongfully procuring a warrant for his arrest” arose from § 1252(g)
• affirming the district court’s dismissal pursuant to § 1252(g) after finding that the plaintiff was challenging “actions taken to commence removal proceedings.”
• “Securing an alien while awaiting a removal determination constitutes an action taken to commence proceedings.”
• “Securing an alien while awaiting a removal determination constitutes an action taken to commence proceedings.”
• “Securing an alien while awaiting a removal determination constitutes an action taken to commence proceedings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).