Anel Suarez-Torres v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a district court’s “revocation sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)” does not violate a defendant’s “constitutional rights to have a jury determine his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt”
• “Until the Supreme Court invalidates § 3583(e)(3), we must follow our precedent and hold that the revocation of Eagle Chasing’s release did not violate his constitutional rights.”
• “Until the Supreme Court invalidates [18 U.S.C.] § 3583(e)(3), we must follow our precedent and hold that the revocation of Eagle Chasing’s release did not violate his constitutional rights.”
• “Unlike a revocation under § 3583(k), revocation under § 3583(e)(3) is a sanction connected to the original offense, and the statute affords the district court wide discretion to determine whether to revoke supervision and what sentence to impose.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).