Andy Consuelo v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the abuse of discretion standard of review governs review of the trial court’s determination that a proposal for settlement was not made in good faith
• “The abuse of discretion standard of review governs this Court’s review of a trial court’s determination that a proposal for settlement was not made in good faith.”
• “The abuse of discretion standard of review governs this Court’s review of a trial court’s determination that a proposal for settlement was not made in good faith.”
• “The abuse of discretion standard of review governs this Court’s review of a trial court’s determination that a proposal for settlement was not made in good faith.”
• “To determine whether State Farm’s settlement offer was justified, we consider whether the record demonstrates conclusively that, at the time [the offer] was made, [State Farm] . . . had a reasonable basis . . . to conclude that [its] exposure was nominal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).